Celje – GOG

match analysis

31/08/2021

Celje – GOG 33:29 (16:12)

The story of the way Celje played is seen through the eyes of HE: App.

The team is significantly more efficient when attacking with two pivots 63% than when attacking with one pivot 43% and it is interesting that with two pivots they played only 8 possessions, and with one pivot 28 possessions.

In the first half, Celje made a difference of 4 goals and scored 16 goals, which is good, but it is a consequence of a lot of goals from ”running actions” (fast break, counter-attack,…) – 6, while the positional attack was very ineffective – 30%

We see the main reason for such inefficiency in the first half in the disproportion between the quality of the team’s play and the ratio of minutes between Vlaho and Strmljan. 

When Vlah played, the efficiency was 39%, and with Strmljan, the team scored 58% of possession. 

Vlah participated in 23 attacks, and Strmljan in 12 of them.

A similar ratio was in the statistics of the whole match: with Vlah in the lineup 53% (19/36), and with Strmljan 67% (16/24)

The difference in their game is even more significant when you look at the efficiency of some of the lineups of 9m players in which they participate:

Ivankovic – Strmljan – Perzic 67% (6/9)

Ivankovic – Strmljan – Mlakar 78% (7/9)

while in principle the first lineup of 9m players Ivanković – Vlah – Mlakar is 23% (12/23)

Using HE: App live on or after the game, the coach would know this information and might decide that the more successful lineups of 9m players play more and maybe the team would attack more with 2 pivots, so maybe the victory would be with a bigger goal difference.

The story of the way GOG played seen through the eyes of HE: App.

Although they lost by 4 goals, they can hope to pass in the next round if they do not repeat the extremely bad first half in which they had 5 technical errors and the efficiency of the positional attack only 35%.

A big room for improvement is the realization of Tollbring 6/11 from the wing and from the 7-meter line.

The team’s play depends almost exclusively on the form of the Pytlick – Olsen – Gidsel 55% (20/36) line of 9m players who play the vast majority of the possession.

An important role plays Laerke who rests very successfully Pytlick 55% (5/9).

The key details in return could be the 7on6 attack in which they were extremely successful 83% (5/6)

in this match and playing with 2 pivots: Jorgensen and Bergendal 77% (7/9) which played in this match 7na6 and 6on5.

PSG – THW KIEL 63:62

PSG – THW KIEL 63:62

After 2 hours of handball, Kiel won 63: 62 and Luc Steins shot for the overall win. https://youtu.be/fHRw4FwJQr4 In matches decided by one shot, every detail is crucial.Sometimes that detail lies in deciding whether both games will be played significantly longer by...

read more
VESZPREM – PORTO 28:28

VESZPREM – PORTO 28:28

Superficially Veszprem missed the chance to win because they had the ball and time-out half a minute before the end of the match. https://youtu.be/ogcW_PSjZNo They had a real chance to win throughout the game, and the key element was not one, but a whole series of...

read more
METZ HANDBALL – KRIM MERCATOR 27:27

METZ HANDBALL – KRIM MERCATOR 27:27

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwBJdnmLnIU Metz had a chance to win and apparently, they were unlucky and did not win due to a missed shot in the final seconds.However, 59:57 min. before that shot, a lot happened and there were a lot of chances to win.How can we...

read more
COULD POLAND HAVE DONE BETTER?

COULD POLAND HAVE DONE BETTER?

https://youtu.be/umSZuZfuqNs This was the most important moment of the match, the goal with which Poland lost a point.Could Poland have avoided this situation?Could the coach have done something so that the final result did not depend on one shot?We followed the match...

read more
NORWAY – RUSSIA 22:23

NORWAY – RUSSIA 22:23

When the best player plays a match in which he has a 4/11 shot, it is not easy to win. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFxudXog3D8 When the center back has a large number of technical errors, it seems impossible to win. However, it is not always the case. It is our...

read more
FRANCE – NORWAY 22:29 (16:12)

FRANCE – NORWAY 22:29 (16:12)

Sometimes it's doing nothingthe best thing a coach can do. France led 16:10 in the 28th minute and Norway won 29:22. Norway changed the goalkeeper in the 22nd minute and nothing more.France changed everything it could. STRUCTURE OF THE ATTACK Norway played almost...

read more
C.S.Dinamo Bucuresti – HC Motor 33:29 (16:14)

C.S.Dinamo Bucuresti – HC Motor 33:29 (16:14)

Two back players score 3 goals and the difference in their impact on the score is huge. How can quality performance measurement help a coach during a game to determine their playing time? Vladyslav Dontsov scored 3 goals from 6 shots, and Luka Šebetić 3/3. That is the...

read more
HBC Nantes – SL Benfica 33:33 (16:17)

HBC Nantes – SL Benfica 33:33 (16:17)

Why is it often most important to evaluate the performance of the center back on team efficiency? Rok Ovniček scored 2 goals from 5 attempts, and Aymeric Minne scored 2 goals from 4 attempts. There is no big difference. When Ovniček played, the team had 47% efficiency...

read more